Why cancer patients often need more than information: a reliable way to weigh evidence, incentives, risk, values, uncertainty, and changing research without confusing investigation with proof.
Separate evidence that some parasites can contribute to cancer from claims that antiparasitic drugs cure it, including the viral fenbendazole story.
A serious diagnosis raises questions evidence alone can’t answer. Here’s why the question isn’t how to be happy despite what’s happening — it’s where the meaning is, and how to stay connected…
Learn why clinical trial offers and genomic reports can feel like definitive answers while actually creating a new set of decisions and uncertainties.
Understand what a median survival statistic actually means, what it cannot predict about one individual, and why context matters more than a single number.
Learn what the Warburg effect actually shows about cancer metabolism, why cutting sugar does not simply “starve” tumors, and where debate remains.
Understand what integrative oncology means, how it differs from alternative medicine, and why evidence-based supportive care belongs alongside treatment.
Understand what Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials can establish, what they cannot, and why promising early cancer results often fail later.
Learn how to evaluate repurposed-drug cancer claims by separating biological plausibility, early evidence, anecdotes, and reliable clinical results.
Reflect on how mortality awareness can clarify priorities, relationships, and what deserves space in a life that cannot be controlled completely.